TL DR: I didn't check the Hainbach video if he means something very specific and weird with "asynchronous loops", or if the post is old enough that it wasn't for some reason possible then, but you can certainly have clips / loops of different lengths running against each other in the current "stable" Deluge 3.1 firmware as well - just make a new track for each and adjust their sequence lengths to whatever you want. It's really cool workflow-wise to be able to do that inside a single sequence, though. Synthstrom Deluge vs Akai Force in terms of workflow and results About to pull the trigger on one of these two. The 4.0 just allows you to do the same thing inside a single clip / sequence, so the individual rows (samples or notes) have different lengths, but you don't really need that to do polymetric rhythms. The sequencer itself has more resolution, but that's how far you can zoom in the UI right now so you can't make the difference between two clips smaller than 1/128. I think the maximum edit resolution of the sequencer, and hence the minimum step is something like 1/128, so you can do some phasing-like things as well. have one clip 5/16, another 9/16 and a third one at 31/32 running polymetrically against each other for example. Even now with the 3.1 you can have different length clips running next to each other on separate tracks - you can eg. I think that's a more advanced use case though. Yes independent lengths within a kit is a feature of upcoming fw, so not official yet, just for beta testers The Polyend device turned out to be the Polyend Play, a groovebox with a simplistic sequencer, no arranger mode, and limited polyphony. Since then the Deluge screen has been upgraded, but unfortunately little else has changed. Three years in the making, it is an all-in-one. The Synthstrom Deluge Interface is a Hot Mess, and What to Do About It This rant was written in 2021. Maybe a new firmware feature that had been added? Powerful and robust synthesizer, sampler & sequencer in a portable package.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |